The etymological origin of dissent It is found in the Latin word dissensus. The dissent refers to a discrepancy , a rift or a disagreement .
For example: “There is dissent in the government about how to deal with the agricultural crisis”, “In my team there is room for dissent and dialogue”, “The fascist regime did not tolerate dissent and appealed to various repressive mechanisms to silence the opponents ”.
It can be said that dissent arises from a dissent : that is, when there is no coincidence with the feeling or opinion of someone. Two people who disagree, therefore, do not think the same about a certain subject. Coincidence or agreement, on the other hand, produces a consensus .
There are various positions on dissent. The authoritarian governments , to cite a case, do not endorse dissent since they choose to censor criticism. In this way, if someone expresses themselves against the government , that dissent tries to be eliminated through different types of punishments. Authoritarianism can also appear in a company, in a club or in other organizations, always trying to prevent dissent.
In other contexts, dissent is valued as something positive . There are those who believe that the debate and the confrontation between different opinions or ideas It can be enriching: dissent, in this framework, can be the starting point for the construction of a new element or the development of a new thought. Suppose that, to a board of directors of a company, a group of executives arrives with a project and meets another that brings a very different proposal. In the beginning there is dissent: each sector objects to the entrepreneurship of the other. With the progress of the talks and negotiations, finally everyone agrees to realize an alternative project that brings together points of the two options raised in a first stage.
The same can happen in postures as opposed as carnism and veganism, which represent the group of people who consume products of animal origin and the opposite, who only feed on plant foods, respectively. While the carnistas consider that animals are resources that the planet puts at our disposal and that we must exploit them to, among other things, feed ourselves, vegans believe in the equality of all species, and for that reason they refuse to kill to eat . The dissent is clear, and can be seen in many debates in public media.
No matter how delicate the topics to be treated in a debate clearly polarized, that is to say where the parties expose opposing ideas, dissent can always lead to conversation, exchange and growth of all participants, provided it manifests itself in an orderly and respectful manner.
One of the best starting points when talking to someone on the opposite side is to ask "why." It is not advised to enter the conversation with accusations and affirmations, but to begin by asking information to try to understand the position of the other. Each human being may think that his point of view is correct, that his particular vision of reality is true, so to speak; and perhaps this is natural, but we should not feed that egocentrism and validate it as an argument of an argument.
It is also recommended to implement the empathy , even in cases where we know we would never change our mind to adopt the position of the other. If we are talking to someone whose ideas seem atrocious to us, it does not hurt to put ourselves in their place simply to change perspective and understand why they think that way. At best, this will give us more tools to turn dissent into a consensus.